What Is Negligence?

Negligence is a legal term used to describe a situation where someone fails to take reasonable care, resulting in harm or loss to another person. Under UK law, negligence is a type of tort – a civil wrong that allows the injured party to seek compensation through the courts. While criminal law deals with offences against the state, tort law focuses on resolving disputes between individuals or organisations. To learn more about the wider context of torts and how they differ from criminal offences, you may find it helpful to read this Tort overview from the University of Law.

In simple terms, a person is negligent if they do something (or fail to do something) that a reasonable person would not have done in the same situation, and this carelessness causes someone else to suffer injury, damage, or financial loss. Negligence can arise in many everyday situations. Common examples include:

  • Accidents: A driver who is distracted and causes a road traffic accident may be considered negligent if they did not pay proper attention to the road.
  • Faulty products: If a manufacturer fails to ensure their products are safe and someone is injured as a result, the company could be held liable for negligence.
  • Carelessness at work or in public places: Employers or property owners who do not maintain safe environments – such as failing to fix a broken step or clean up a spill – might be found negligent if someone is hurt as a result.

To make a successful negligence claim, the person bringing the claim (the claimant) must prove several key elements:

  • Duty of care: The defendant owed them a legal duty to take reasonable care.
  • Breach of duty: The defendant failed to meet that standard of care.
  • Causation: The breach of duty directly caused the claimant’s injury or loss.
  • Loss or damage: Actual harm or financial loss resulted from the incident.

Establishing these elements is essential, as failing to prove any one of them can mean the claim will not succeed. Negligence claims form a significant part of civil disputes in the UK, where individuals or businesses seek compensation for harm that was avoidable.

Understanding negligence is the first step in recognising your rights if you have suffered due to someone else’s lack of care. For a broader explanation of tort law, including how negligence fits within it, you can refer to this Tort guide.

Key Elements of a Negligence Claim

Negligence is a fundamental concept in UK tort law, and for a claim to succeed, four key elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damage. Understanding each element is crucial for anyone considering a negligence claim.

Duty of Care

The first step in any negligence case is establishing that the defendant owed the claimant a duty of care. This means there was a legal obligation to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm. The classic test for duty of care comes from the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], which introduced the “neighbour principle” – you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably injure your “neighbour,” meaning anyone who might be affected by your actions.

UK courts have refined this test over time, considering factors like foreseeability of harm, proximity between the parties, and whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty. Recent developments and approaches to the duty of care have been discussed by legal scholars, and courts may look to academic research and precedent when determining whether a duty exists in new or complex situations.

Breach of Duty

Once a duty of care is established, the claimant must show that the defendant breached that duty. This occurs when the defendant’s conduct falls below the standard expected of a reasonable person in the same circumstances. The standard can vary depending on the relationship between the parties and the nature of the activity. For example, professionals are expected to meet the standards of their profession, while ordinary individuals are judged by what a reasonable person would do.

Courts consider several factors when deciding if a breach has occurred, such as:

  • The likelihood of harm
  • The seriousness of potential harm
  • The cost and practicality of taking precautions
  • The social utility of the defendant’s conduct

Causation

Causation links the breach of duty to the harm suffered by the claimant. The claimant must prove that the defendant’s breach actually caused their loss or injury. This involves two main tests:

  • Factual causation: Would the harm have occurred “but for” the defendant’s actions?
  • Legal causation: Was the harm a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach, or was it too remote?

Causation can be complex, especially when there are multiple possible causes of harm. Courts often look at whether the chain of events was broken by an intervening act (known as “novus actus interveniens”). For a detailed discussion of how causation is interpreted in tort law, see this analysis of causation in negligence cases.

Damage

Finally, the claimant must have suffered actual damage – either physical injury, property damage, or financial loss. The law does not compensate for trivial harm or mere inconvenience. The damage must be a direct result of the defendant’s breach and not too remote. In some cases, courts may consider whether the type of damage was reasonably foreseeable at the time of the breach.

How Courts Assess Negligence

When deciding negligence claims, courts examine each of these elements carefully and require the claimant to prove their case “on the balance of probabilities.” Evidence such as witness statements, expert reports, and documentation of losses is crucial. If any element cannot be established, the claim will not succeed.

The assessment is fact-specific, and legal developments continue to shape how these principles are applied. For more information on the evolving approach to duty of care, refer to the duty of care resource. For a deeper understanding of how causation is interpreted in negligence, the causation article provides valuable insights.

Understanding these key elements can help you assess whether you may have a valid negligence claim and what evidence you will need to support your case. If you believe you have suffered harm due to someone else’s negligence, seeking legal advice can help you navigate the process and improve your chances of a successful outcome.

Do I have enough evidence to prove negligence in my case?

Common Types of Negligence Claims

Negligence can occur in many everyday situations, and understanding the most common types of claims can help you recognise when you might have a right to compensation. Below, we explain the main areas where negligence claims frequently arise in the UK, along with practical examples and guidance on where to find further information.

Personal Injury Claims

One of the most frequent types of negligence claims involves personal injury. If you have been hurt because someone else failed to take reasonable care – whether in a road accident, a public place, or elsewhere – you may be able to make a claim. This includes injuries caused by unsafe premises, defective products, or lack of proper warning signs. To learn more about how these cases work, see our detailed guide to personal injury claims.

Slip, Trip, and Fall Accidents

Slip, trip, and fall accidents are classic examples of negligence. These often happen in supermarkets, on pavements, or in public buildings when hazards like wet floors or uneven surfaces are not properly managed. The law requires those responsible for a property (the "occupiers") to ensure it is reasonably safe for visitors. This duty is set out in the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, which explains what is expected from property owners and managers. If you have suffered an injury in this way, our guide to slip, trip, and fall claims offers practical advice on what to do next.

Workplace Negligence

Employers have a legal responsibility to protect their employees’ health and safety at work. If you are injured because your employer failed to provide safe equipment, proper training, or a hazard-free environment, you may have grounds for a negligence claim. The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 sets out employers’ duties in this area, covering everything from risk assessments to accident prevention. For more information on your rights and the steps to take after an accident at work, visit our section on workplace accidents.

Damage to Property

Negligence isn’t limited to personal injuries – it can also involve damage to your property. For example, if a neighbour’s carelessness causes a fire or flood that damages your home, or if a contractor damages your belongings during building work, you may be able to claim compensation. The key question is whether the other party owed you a duty of care and failed to meet it, causing you loss or damage.

Faulty Goods and Poor Services

Negligence can also arise if you suffer loss because of faulty goods or poor-quality services. For instance, if a tradesperson’s careless work leads to damage or injury, or if a product you purchased is unsafe due to manufacturing errors, you may have a claim. In these cases, you have rights under consumer protection laws as well as the general law of negligence. If you are dealing with ongoing issues related to goods or services, our guide to consumer problems with faulty goods or services can help you understand your options and next steps.


Understanding these common types of negligence claims can help you identify when you might have a legal right to compensation. If you’re unsure about your situation, exploring the resources linked above can provide more detailed guidance on your rights and the claims process.

Could I claim negligence for my recent injury or property damage?

Negligence and Other Types of Torts

When discussing civil wrongs in UK law, negligence is one of the most common torts, but it is far from the only one. Understanding the different types of torts is important, as each has its own rules and ways to seek compensation. Here, we look at some of the other major torts you might encounter, how they differ from negligence, and why knowing the exact nature of your claim matters.

Other Common Types of Torts

Alongside negligence, the law recognises several other torts that can give rise to a claim:

  • Nuisance: This tort covers situations where someone’s actions or property use interferes with your enjoyment of your own property. For example, if a neighbour regularly creates excessive noise or emits unpleasant odours, you may have a claim in nuisance.
  • Trespass: Trespass can take several forms, such as trespass to land (entering someone’s property without permission), trespass to the person (unlawful physical contact), and trespass to goods (interfering with someone’s possessions). Unlike negligence, trespass does not always require proof of damage – simply the act itself can be enough.
  • Defamation: Defamation occurs when someone makes a false statement that damages your reputation. This tort is split into defamation claims, which include both libel (written or published statements) and slander (spoken statements). Unlike negligence, defamation is focused on harm to reputation rather than physical or financial loss. The law around defamation in England and Wales was significantly updated by the Defamation Act 2013, which clarifies what counts as defamation and sets out defences and procedures for claims.

How Defamation Differs from Negligence

While both negligence and defamation can cause serious harm, the type of harm and the legal requirements differ. Negligence usually involves a breach of a duty of care that results in physical injury or financial loss. In contrast, defamation is about protecting your reputation from false and damaging statements. For more on how these claims are handled and what you need to prove, see our page on defamation claims.

Overlapping Torts in Disputes

It is possible for a single incident to involve more than one tort. For example, if someone enters your property without permission and causes damage, you might have claims for both trespass and negligence. Similarly, a defamatory statement made at a public event could also amount to harassment or intentional infliction of emotional distress. In such cases, understanding which torts apply can help you decide the best way to pursue your claim and maximise your chances of success.

Why Identifying the Right Tort Matters

Each type of tort has its own legal requirements, time limits, and potential remedies. For example, the rules for proving negligence are different from those for defamation or nuisance. Knowing which tort is involved ensures you follow the correct procedures, gather the right evidence, and seek the compensation or remedy that fits your situation. If you’re unsure which tort applies to your case, seeking legal advice early on is essential.

By recognising the differences between negligence and other torts like nuisance, trespass, and defamation, you can better understand your rights and the steps needed to protect them. For a deeper look at defamation law, the Defamation Act 2013 provides a detailed overview of the current legal standards and protections in place.

Could my situation involve more than one type of tort?

Making a Negligence Claim: The Legal Process

When you believe you have suffered loss or injury because of someone else’s negligence, it’s important to understand the steps involved in making a legal claim. The process can seem daunting, but breaking it down makes it more manageable and helps you protect your rights.

1. Initial Steps: Assessing Your Claim

Start by considering whether your situation meets the key elements of negligence: the other party owed you a duty of care, they breached that duty, and you suffered damage as a result. If you are unsure, it’s wise to seek legal advice early on, as a solicitor can help assess the strength of your claim and explain your options.

2. Gathering Evidence

Strong evidence is essential to support your negligence claim. You should:

  • Document your injury or loss: Take photographs, keep medical records, and save any receipts for expenses related to your injury.
  • Collect witness statements: If anyone saw the incident, ask them for a written account.
  • Keep a timeline: Record dates, times, and details of what happened and any correspondence with the other party.

This evidence will be crucial if your case goes to court.

3. Attempting Early Resolution

Before starting formal legal proceedings, it’s often recommended to try resolving the dispute directly with the other party. This might involve writing a letter of claim setting out what happened, the losses you have suffered, and what you are seeking in compensation. Sometimes, disputes can be settled at this stage without going to court.

4. Filing a Claim in the Civil Courts

If you cannot resolve the matter informally, you may need to file a claim in the appropriate civil court. The types of civil courts and timelines vary depending on the value and complexity of your claim. For lower-value disputes (generally under £10,000), you might use the small claims court, which is designed to be more accessible for individuals without legal representation. More complex or higher-value negligence claims may be heard in the High Court.

All civil claims, including those for negligence, are governed by the Civil Procedure Rules 1998. These rules set out the steps you must follow, including how to start a claim, exchange evidence, and prepare for a court hearing.

5. Possible Outcomes

Once your claim is heard, the court will decide whether negligence occurred and, if so, what compensation you should receive. Possible outcomes include:

  • Award of damages: If your claim succeeds, the court may order the other party to pay you compensation for your loss or injury.
  • Case dismissal: If the court finds there was no negligence, your claim may be dismissed, and you might be required to pay some of the other party’s legal costs.
  • Settlement: At any stage, you and the other party can agree to settle the claim out of court.

6. The Role of Legal Advice and Representation

While some straightforward claims – especially those in the small claims court – can be handled without a lawyer, legal advice is invaluable in more complex cases. A solicitor can help you prepare your case, gather evidence, and negotiate settlements. They will also ensure you meet all deadlines and comply with the Civil Procedure Rules 1998.


Understanding the process of making a negligence claim helps you make informed decisions and increases your chances of achieving a fair outcome. For more details on court procedures, see the types of civil courts and timelines or explore how the High Court deals with negligence claims. If your dispute is for a smaller sum, the small claims court may be the most suitable route.

Can you guide me on preparing evidence for my negligence claim?

Negligence Claims Involving Public Bodies

When a government department, local council, or other public body causes harm through carelessness or failure to meet their legal duties, you may be able to bring a negligence claim against them. However, pursuing negligence claims involving public bodies in the UK comes with special considerations compared to claims against private individuals or companies.

How Negligence Applies to Public Bodies

Public bodies, such as local councils, the NHS, or government departments, owe a duty of care to the public in many situations – just like private organisations. If they breach this duty and someone suffers loss or injury as a result, a negligence claim may be possible. However, the law recognises that public bodies have unique responsibilities and limited resources, so not every mistake or poor service will amount to legal negligence.

For example, a local council may be liable if it fails to repair a dangerous pavement within a reasonable time and someone is injured as a result. The Local Government Act 1972 outlines many of the duties and functions of local authorities in England and Wales, including their responsibility to maintain public spaces safely.

Special Rules and Considerations

There are important differences when making claims against public bodies:

  • Legal Protections and Immunities: Some actions by public bodies are protected by law, especially where decisions involve policy or resource allocation. The courts may decide that it is not appropriate to impose liability for certain discretionary decisions.
  • Statutory Frameworks: Public bodies often operate under specific statutes that define their duties. If a duty is set out in legislation and breached, this can strengthen a negligence claim.
  • Procedural Requirements: Bringing a claim against a public body may involve special procedures, such as giving advance notice of your claim or following a formal complaints process before starting court action. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 governs how claims can be brought against the Crown (government departments and agencies), setting out the rules for civil liability.

For more guidance on how these rules apply and what steps to take, see our page on claims against public bodies.

Common Examples

Negligence claims against public bodies can arise in many situations, such as:

  • Local Authority Negligence: Failing to maintain roads, pavements, or public parks, leading to accidents or injuries.
  • Public Service Failures: Errors in social services, housing provision, or public health that cause harm.
  • Emergency Services: Although the police, ambulance, and fire services have some legal protections, they may still be liable if they act with gross negligence.

Timely Action and Understanding Procedures

If you believe you have a negligence claim against a public body, it is vital to act quickly. There are strict time limits – usually three years from the date of the incident for personal injury claims, but sometimes shorter deadlines apply, especially if you need to go through a complaints process first.

Understanding the correct procedures and gathering evidence early can make a significant difference to your case. Public bodies often have dedicated legal teams, so consider seeking advice as soon as possible.

For more information on the legal responsibilities of local authorities, you can read the Local Government Act 1972. If your claim involves a government department or agency, the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 sets out the rules for bringing claims against the Crown.

Understanding the unique aspects of negligence claims involving public bodies will help you protect your rights and navigate the process effectively.

Can I claim if a council or government body caused my injury?

Negligence in Relation to Contracts and Consumer Rights

When it comes to everyday transactions, negligence and contract law often overlap – especially in situations where a party fails to meet their obligations. For example, if you hire a builder to renovate your kitchen and they perform the work carelessly, causing damage to your property, you may have grounds for both a negligence claim and a breach of contract claim. Negligence arises when someone fails to take reasonable care, resulting in loss or damage, while contract law focuses on whether the agreed terms have been fulfilled.

In consumer transactions, negligence can lead to financial loss or damage to your belongings. Imagine purchasing a new appliance that is installed incorrectly by a technician, causing a leak and damaging your flooring. In this case, you might consider whether the installer acted negligently, or whether the issue is better addressed as a breach of contract. The distinction can affect your legal options and the compensation you may receive. For more on how these areas interact, see our guide to contract disputes.

Sometimes, misleading information or false statements can also play a role in consumer disputes. If you’ve suffered a loss because you relied on incorrect details provided by a seller or service provider, the Misrepresentation Act 1967 sets out your rights and possible remedies. This law protects consumers when misrepresentation leads to a contract being formed under false pretences, which can overlap with claims of negligence.

When deciding whether to pursue a negligence claim or a contract dispute, consider the nature of the problem. If the issue is about the quality of service or goods provided, and specific terms of an agreement have been breached, a contract claim may be more appropriate. However, if someone’s careless actions outside the contract terms have caused harm or loss, a negligence claim could be the better route.

Negligence is also relevant when it comes to protecting your belongings at home. If, for example, a tradesperson working in your house causes accidental damage to your possessions, you might be covered by your household contents insurance. Insurance policies often include provisions for loss or damage caused by third-party negligence, so it’s worth checking your policy details and understanding what is covered.

In summary, negligence can play a significant role in both contract and consumer matters. Understanding the difference – and knowing when to claim for negligence versus a contract breach – can help you protect your rights and seek appropriate compensation. If you’re unsure which route to take, reviewing your contract, insurance policy, and the circumstances of your loss can provide clarity and help you decide on the best course of action.

Should I claim negligence or breach of contract for my damaged property?

Resolving Negligence Disputes Without Going to Court

Resolving Negligence Disputes Without Going to Court

Taking a negligence dispute to court isn’t always the only – or best – way to resolve the issue. In many cases, there are alternative methods that can help you reach an agreement more quickly, with less stress and expense. Here’s how you can handle negligence claims without resorting to formal legal proceedings.

Alternatives to Court: Mediation and Negotiation

Mediation and negotiation are two common ways to settle negligence disputes outside of court. Mediation involves an independent third party (the mediator) who helps both sides discuss their issues and work towards a mutually acceptable solution. It’s a confidential process, and the mediator does not take sides or make decisions for you.

Negotiation is a more informal approach, where you or your representative communicate directly with the other party to try and agree on a resolution. This could involve agreeing on compensation, an apology, or another remedy.

Both mediation and negotiation can save time and money. They often preserve relationships, which is important if you need to continue dealing with the other party in the future.

Benefits of Resolving Disputes Amicably

Settling a negligence dispute outside of court has several advantages:

  • Speed: Alternative dispute resolution is usually much quicker than waiting for a court date.
  • Cost: Legal fees and court costs can be significant. Mediation or negotiation is often far less expensive.
  • Control: You have more say in the outcome and can agree on creative solutions that a court might not consider.
  • Privacy: Court cases are public, but mediation and negotiation are private and confidential.

When Court Action May Still Be Needed

Sometimes, despite your best efforts, it may not be possible to reach an agreement. You might need to take legal action if:

  • The other party refuses to cooperate or negotiate.
  • The dispute involves serious harm or significant financial loss.
  • There’s a risk that evidence will be lost or destroyed.
  • You need a legally binding decision that only a court can provide.

If you do decide to go to court, your case will be governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, which set out the steps you must follow in civil claims, including those involving negligence.

Help From Consumer Protection Services

If your negligence dispute involves goods or services – for example, if you’ve suffered loss because a company failed to meet proper standards – consumer protection services can offer valuable support. They can help you understand your rights, guide you through the complaint process, and sometimes intervene directly with the business involved. For more practical advice, see our guide on solving consumer problems.

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 is a key piece of legislation that protects consumers from negligence by traders or service providers. It sets out your rights to receive goods and services that are of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. If these standards aren’t met, you may be entitled to a repair, replacement, or compensation.


Exploring alternatives to court can often lead to quicker, less stressful, and more satisfactory outcomes. However, if informal approaches fail, knowing your legal rights and the formal process can help you make informed decisions about your next steps.


Check if Contend can help you with your issue

Solve your legal question quickly
and easily with Contend.



This material is for general information only and does not constitute
tax, legal or any other form of advice. You should not rely on any
information contained herein to make (or refrain from making) any
decisions. Always obtain independent, professional advice for your
own particular situation. Contend Inc is not regulated by the
Solicitors Regulation Authority.